Blue sUAS purchased by Pentagon ‘8 to 14 times’ more expensive than DJI drones

Drones labeled “蓝色 sUAS” approved by the US 国防部 are 8 to 14 times more expensive to purchase than the Chinese DJI drones they replace. In addition, users complain about the less broad usability of the 蓝色 sUAS alternatives. This is evident from an internal government memo that has come into the hands of the Financial Times.

Blue sUAS purchased by Pentagon ‘8 to 14 times’ more expensive than DJI drones

According to the memo, the Pentagon spent $13 million developing alternatives to DJI’s drones, among others. The idea was to become less dependent on Chinese technology. American or European camera drones were to be put in their place. To this end, the Blue sUAS program was established at the end of 2020. Only a handful of suppliers, including 鹦鹉 和 Skydio, were allowed to participate in this program and supply drones to US government organizations after a strict selection procedure.

Not only users within the Department of Defense were obliged to only use drones with a Blue sUAS label. Other agencies, including the Department of the Interior, were also banned from using Chinese drones by the Trump administration. The measure also affected fire brigades and inspection services, which until then mostly worked with drones from market leader 大疆创新. In addition to drones from 中国, then-President Trump also banned many other Chinese-made equipments.

Blue sUAS are more expensive and less versatile

The problem, however, is that the alternative systems are much more expensive and less performing, according to a memo prepared in January this year for the new Biden administration.

“Using only Blue sUAS systems has reduced the sensor capacity of the Department of the Interior by 95%. The drones have been specifically developed for military purposes and are only suitable for other applications in 20% of the cases.”

Blue sUAS drones contain Chinese-made parts

Another issue is that US and European drones contain many Chinese components. According to a report from the Department of Defense, four out of five Blue sUAS models still contain many parts made in China, including processors and sensors. The question is therefore whether the drones with the Blue sUAS predicate are any safer in the field of cyber espionage.

Work comes to a standstill

Government officials warn in the memo that much work has come to a standstill because fewer drones can be purchased by the Department of the Interior. “The current situation makes it almost impossible to carry out our statutory management tasks, including mapping and protecting large natural areas,” the memo warns.

[bctt tweet=”“Using only Blue sUAS systems has reduced the sensor capacity of the Department of the Interior by 95%. The drones have been specifically developed for military purposes and are only suitable for other applications in 20% of the cases.”” username=”DroneXL1″]

获取第 107 部分证书

通过测试，带着 试点研究所. We have helped thousands of people become airplane and commercial drone pilots. Our courses are designed by industry experts to help you pass FAA tests and achieve your dreams.

保持联系！

If you’d like to stay up to date with all the latest drone news, scoops, rumors, and reviews follow us on 推特, 在 Facebook 上, YouTube, Instagram, or…

订阅我们的每日无人机新闻电子邮件*。

提交提示 如果您想与我们分享信息或技巧，请随时提交 这里. 支持 DroneXL.co： 您可以在下次购买无人机时使用这些链接来支持 DroneXL.co： Adorama, 亚马逊, B&H, 百思买, 易趣网, 大疆创新, 鹦鹉和 Yuneec.我们会在您不支付额外费用的情况下收取少量佣金。感谢您帮助 DroneXL 发展！ 联邦贸易委员会： DroneXL.co 使用可产生收入的联盟链接。

* 我们绝不出售、共享、出租或发送垃圾邮件。我们的电子邮件在工作日下午 5:30 左右发出。

This article first appeared on Dronewatch and is written by 维贝-德-雅格 who is also a DroneXL contributor.